Individuals Behind the Record

---

Not all Fairness Collective contributors are public facing, and that is by design. Many choose not to be publicly visible, despite holding advanced degrees, professional expertise, and firsthand experience with the systems under examination. They engage through policy analysis, research, subject matter collaboration, and strategic consult

Not all Fairness Collective contributors are public facing, and that is by design. Many choose not to be publicly visible, despite holding advanced degrees, professional expertise, and firsthand experience with the systems under examination. They engage through policy analysis, research, subject matter collaboration, and strategic consultation. In an environment where institutional power is routinely abused and accountability resisted; discretion is often a matter of necessity.   

What binds this group is expertise, individual responsibility, informed analysis, and a refusal to defer truth to systems that no longer recognize human consequence.

Gina Bloom is a legal professional with a Bachelor’s degree in Legal Studies and an advanced paralegal certificate, with training and experience in litigation support, statutory analysis, and court procedure. She is a DOJ certified crime victim advocate who has worked with individuals navigating high-risk legal processes involving coerciv

Gina Bloom is a legal professional with a Bachelor’s degree in Legal Studies and an advanced paralegal certificate, with training and experience in litigation support, statutory analysis, and court procedure. She is a DOJ certified crime victim advocate who has worked with individuals navigating high-risk legal processes involving coercive control, retaliation, and institutional power imbalances.

A legal immigrant and now naturalized U.S. citizen, Gina has lived in the United States for nearly two decades. Her professional confidence in constitutional safeguards and due process was profoundly challenged after systemic failures within the family court system placed her and her children at risk, despite documented evidence and subsequent law enforcement findings involving court-appointed actors. Her work now focuses on examining how credible parents can be mischaracterized, disempowered, or silenced within family law systems that prioritize procedural compliance over child safety. Through investigative reporting, she documents how institutional failures unfold, how professional authority is insulated from accountability, and why these constitutional failures persist.

Kim Morrigan is a researcher and writer focused on documenting institutional failure and betrayal, with particular attention to how women are disproportionately harmed by systems charged with public protection. Her work examines how modern narratives of equality coexist with judicial practices, political immunity, and administrative failu

Kim Morrigan is a researcher and writer focused on documenting institutional failure and betrayal, with particular attention to how women are disproportionately harmed by systems charged with public protection. Her work examines how modern narratives of equality coexist with judicial practices, political immunity, and administrative failures that expose individuals to foreseeable and preventable harm.

Drawing on more than two decades of independent historical research, Kim situates contemporary institutional failures within a broader historical context, tracing how narratives about women have been distorted or erased to justify enduring power imbalances. At the same time, her work recognizes that men and boys are also harmed by these systems, often through different mechanisms but driven by the same structural incentives that prioritize institutional preservation over human safety.

With a background in legal research and cultural analysis, Kim approaches institutional harm through rigorous documentation, statutory interpretation, and pattern recognition across cases. As part of this platform’s research and writing team, her work centers individual outcomes over ideology, restoring clarity to the public record by exposing how policy design, professional discretion, and procedural shielding subordinate human dignity to institutional convenience.